{"data":{"id":12977,"title":"News Update: WILL WE NEVER LEARN?","rsi_url":"https:\/\/robertsspaceindustries.com\/comm-link\/spectrum-dispatch\/12977-News-Update-WILL-WE-NEVER-LEARN","api_url":"https:\/\/api.star-citizen.wiki\/api\/comm-links\/12977","api_public_url":"https:\/\/api.star-citizen.wiki\/comm-links\/12977","channel":"Undefined","category":"Undefined","series":"News Update","images":[{"id":487,"name":"NewUnitedWillWeFI_Crop.jpg","rsi_url":"https:\/\/robertsspaceindustries.com\/media\/jb7vivua5dt95r\/source\/NewUnitedWillWeFI_Crop.jpg","alt":"","size":351859,"mime_type":"image\/jpeg","last_modified":"2013-07-19T05:20:51+00:00","api_url":"https:\/\/api.star-citizen.wiki\/api\/comm-link-images\/487","similar_url":"https:\/\/api.star-citizen.wiki\/api\/comm-link-images\/487\/similar"},{"id":26463,"name":"source.jpg","rsi_url":"https:\/\/media.robertsspaceindustries.com\/weozjmuuh3hwh\/source.jpg","alt":"","size":843046,"mime_type":"image\/jpeg","last_modified":"2019-09-19T15:49:32+00:00","api_url":"https:\/\/api.star-citizen.wiki\/api\/comm-link-images\/26463","similar_url":"https:\/\/api.star-citizen.wiki\/api\/comm-link-images\/26463\/similar"},{"id":27892,"name":"source.jpg","rsi_url":"https:\/\/media.robertsspaceindustries.com\/w3o9r4zgppm77\/source.jpg","alt":"","size":900916,"mime_type":"image\/jpeg","last_modified":"2021-09-06T14:48:40+00:00","api_url":"https:\/\/api.star-citizen.wiki\/api\/comm-link-images\/27892","similar_url":"https:\/\/api.star-citizen.wiki\/api\/comm-link-images\/27892\/similar"}],"images_count":8,"translations":{"en_EN":"NEW UNITED NewsOrg\n\n>>\nWill We Never Learn?\nby Parker Terrell\nStaff Writer\n\nWe aren\u2019t all historians.\n\nMaybe that\u2019s part of the reason that we seem to forget the sins of our fathers, and their fathers, and on back to the dawn of civilization. Or perhaps it\u2019s merely the fact that for the Human race, can and should are frequently treated as interchangeable.\n\nBefore you close comm channels on me for being some modern-day Luddite, let me make it clear that I am neither anti-progress nor anti-technology. Innovation is what makes Humanity so great \u2013 and what got us out into this grand universe in the first place. It is a given that progress generally requires risk.\n\nThe problem is that we often approach technology with a set of blinders on as to what has gone before, whether because the bottom line is more important than cautionary tales or because we\u2019re prideful enough to think that we\u2019ll do better this time. With few exceptions, each generation is more advanced than the last, and so we believe that we cannot possibly err in the same fashion as our parents did. So here we are again. ArcCorp\u2019s new AI intiative, which has been roundly debated since their announcement two weeks ago, again seems to be running towards the same pitfalls as our ancestors.\n\nWe can\u2019t possibly make the same mistakes.\n\nSometimes, it isn\u2019t even our fault that we forget. It took nearly ten years of media investigation to wheedle the truth out of the government that maybe, possibly (sarcasm mine) the AI in the terraforming project had been at the heart of the Mars catastrophe of 2125. By then, nobody wanted to hear about it.\n\nOf course, even that wasn\u2019t the first AI disaster. The so called \u201cLemming Car\u201d incident in 2044 Tokyo holds that honor. But less than 100 years later, the government decided that it had worked out the kinks in AI systems and shipped one off to Mars. Of course, they didn\u2019t tell us about it, just in case they were wrong.\n\nThey were.\n\nAnd then just over 100 years after the Mars catastrophe (are we seeing a trend here, people?), came the Artemis. Janus. Even with the vast spectacle of the launch, somebody somewhere had to be nervous that we were still treading the dangerous road of artificial intelligence. But this time, they were sure they had gotten it right.\n\nAdmittedly, we\u2019re not certain that the disappearance of 5000 people was entirely the AI\u2019s fault, but it certainly had to have played a part.\n\nWith a failure that public, the genie went back into the bottle for a while. But we weren\u2019t done. The UEEN merely went back to being covert when they launched their latest failed AI project. Recently declassified documents show just how close we came to war during what became known as the Horus Incident. Working in conjunction with Aegis, the Navy deployed a prototype AI-piloted Overlord bomber wing along the Xi\u2019An front. Their hearts were in the right place: it was an attempt to bring home pilots that had been stationed along the Perry Line for their entire careers. But when Aegis\u2019 billion-credit babies decided that their comms were compromised and shut them off \u2013 just in time to miss their recall order \u2013 we had to chase down and destroy our own mistake, the death knell for Aegis in the shipbuilding industry. Again, we aren\u2019t sure that they would have plunged us into all-out war with the Xi\u2019An by wandering around unsupervised in the neutral zone, but what might they have done?\n\nOf course, the Imperator tried to keep the whole embarrassing sequence out of the feeds. Still, at least it seemed that we had finally learned a healthy enough fear of ever using AI in ships again.\n\nNow it\u2019s the corporate sector\u2019s turn to believe that it won\u2019t repeat the mistakes of prior generations.\n\nArcCorp tells us that its AI will be able to learn, which will enable it to succeed where others have failed. (Where have we heard that one before?) But here\u2019s the thing: Humans do that, too. They have to have years of experience, specific training, and the proper licenses to ever venture out into space. But ArcCorp wants to once again send the artificial equivalent of children out in massive starships to navigate the vastness of our interstellar empire.\n\nHey, it\u2019s progress. It protects Human lives. It must happen.\n\nWhy can\u2019t we learn?\n\nEND FEED","de_DE":"NEU VEREINIGTE NachrichtenOrganisation\n\n>>\nWerden wir es nie lernen?\nvon Parker Terrell\nPersonalverfasser\n\nWir sind nicht alle Historiker.\n\nVielleicht ist das ein Teil des Grundes, warum wir die S\u00fcnden unserer V\u00e4ter und ihrer V\u00e4ter zu vergessen scheinen und zur\u00fcck zu den Anf\u00e4ngen der Zivilisation. Oder vielleicht ist es nur die Tatsache, dass f\u00fcr die menschliche Rasse, kann und sollte oft als austauschbar behandelt werden.\n\nBevor du die Kommunikationskan\u00e4le f\u00fcr mich schlie\u00dft, weil ich ein moderner Luddite bin, m\u00f6chte ich klarstellen, dass ich weder Antiprogress noch Anti-Technologie bin. Innovation ist das, was die Menschheit so gro\u00dfartig macht - und was uns \u00fcberhaupt in dieses Gro\u00dfe Universum gef\u00fchrt hat. Es ist selbstverst\u00e4ndlich, dass Fortschritt im Allgemeinen Risiken mit sich bringt.\n\nDas Problem ist, dass wir uns der Technologie oft mit einer Reihe von Scheuklappen n\u00e4hern, was bisher passiert ist, sei es, weil das Endergebnis wichtiger ist als Vorsichtsgeschichten oder weil wir stolz genug sind, zu denken, dass wir es diesmal besser machen werden. Bis auf wenige Ausnahmen ist jede Generation weiter entwickelt als die letzte, und deshalb glauben wir, dass wir nicht in der gleichen Weise irren k\u00f6nnen wie unsere Eltern. So, jetzt sind wir wieder da. Die neue KI-Initiative von ArcCorp, die seit ihrer Ank\u00fcndigung vor zwei Wochen intensiv diskutiert wurde, scheint wieder auf die gleichen Fallstricke zuzulaufen wie unsere Vorfahren.\n\nWir k\u00f6nnen unm\u00f6glich die gleichen Fehler machen.\n\nManchmal ist es nicht einmal unsere Schuld, dass wir vergessen. Es dauerte fast zehn Jahre, bis die Regierung die Wahrheit herausfand, dass vielleicht, m\u00f6glicherweise (Sarkasmusmine) die KI im Terraforming-Projekt im Mittelpunkt der Marskatastrophe von 2125 stand. Bis dahin wollte niemand etwas davon h\u00f6ren.\n\nNat\u00fcrlich war selbst das nicht die erste KI-Katastrophe. Der so genannte \"Lemming Car\"-Vorfall im Jahr 2044 in Tokio gilt dieser Ehre. Aber weniger als 100 Jahre sp\u00e4ter entschied die Regierung, dass sie die Knicke in KI-Systemen ausgearbeitet hatte und schickte einen auf den Mars. Nat\u00fcrlich haben sie uns nichts davon erz\u00e4hlt, nur f\u00fcr den Fall, dass sie sich irren.\n\nDas waren sie.\n\nUnd dann, etwas \u00fcber 100 Jahre nach der Marskatastrophe (sehen wir hier einen Trend, Leute?), kamen die Artemis. Janus. Selbst mit dem riesigen Spektakel des Starts musste jemand irgendwo nerv\u00f6s sein, dass wir immer noch den gef\u00e4hrlichen Weg der k\u00fcnstlichen Intelligenz beschreiten. Aber diesmal waren sie sich sicher, dass sie es richtig gemacht hatten.\n\nZugegebenerma\u00dfen sind wir uns nicht sicher, ob das Verschwinden von 5000 Menschen ausschlie\u00dflich die Schuld der KI war, aber es h\u00e4tte sicherlich eine Rolle spielen m\u00fcssen.\n\nMit einem Misserfolg in der \u00d6ffentlichkeit ging der Geist f\u00fcr eine Weile zur\u00fcck in die Flasche. Aber wir waren noch nicht fertig. Die UEEN sind lediglich wieder versteckt, als sie ihr letztes gescheitertes KI-Projekt starteten. K\u00fcrzlich freigegebene Dokumente zeigen, wie nah wir dem Krieg w\u00e4hrend des so genannten Horus-Vorfalls gekommen sind. In Zusammenarbeit mit Aegis setzte die Marine einen Prototyp eines KI-gelenkten Overlord-Bomberfl\u00fcgels entlang der Xi'An-Front ein. Ihr Herz war am rechten Fleck: Es war ein Versuch, Heimpiloten, die entlang der Perry-Linie stationiert waren, f\u00fcr ihre gesamte Karriere zu gewinnen. Aber als die Milliarden-Kredit-Babys von Aegis entschieden, dass ihre Kommunikation kompromittiert war und sie abschalteten - gerade noch rechtzeitig, um ihren R\u00fcckrufauftrag zu verpassen -, mussten wir unseren eigenen Fehler, die Todesglocke f\u00fcr Aegis in der Schiffbauindustrie, jagen und zerst\u00f6ren. Nochmals, wir sind uns nicht sicher, ob sie uns in einen totalen Krieg mit den Xi'An gest\u00fcrzt h\u00e4tten, indem sie unbeaufsichtigt in der neutralen Zone herumgelaufen w\u00e4ren, aber was h\u00e4tten sie tun k\u00f6nnen?\n\nNat\u00fcrlich versuchte der Imperator, die ganze peinliche Sequenz aus den Feeds herauszuhalten. Dennoch schien es zumindest, dass wir endlich eine ausreichend gesunde Angst davor hatten, die KI jemals wieder in Schiffen einzusetzen.\n\nJetzt ist der Unternehmenssektor an der Reihe zu glauben, dass er die Fehler fr\u00fcherer Generationen nicht wiederholen wird.\n\nArcCorp sagt uns, dass seine KI lernen kann, was es ihr erm\u00f6glicht, dort erfolgreich zu sein, wo andere versagt haben. (Wo haben wir das schon mal geh\u00f6rt?) Aber hier ist die Sache: Menschen tun das auch. Sie m\u00fcssen \u00fcber jahrelange Erfahrung, spezifische Schulungen und die entsprechenden Lizenzen verf\u00fcgen, um sich jemals ins All zu wagen. Aber ArcCorp will wieder einmal das k\u00fcnstliche \u00c4quivalent von Kindern in riesigen Raumschiffen losschicken, um durch die Weiten unseres interstellaren Reiches zu navigieren.\n\nHey, es ist ein Fortschritt. Es sch\u00fctzt Menschenleben. Es muss passieren.\n\nWarum k\u00f6nnen wir nicht lernen?\n\n\n\n\nENDE VORSCHUB","zh_CN":"NEW UNITED NewsOrg\n\n>>\nWill We Never Learn?\nby Parker Terrell\nStaff Writer\n\nWe aren\u2019t all historians.\n\nMaybe that\u2019s part of the reason that we seem to forget the sins of our fathers, and their fathers, and on back to the dawn of civilization. Or perhaps it\u2019s merely the fact that for the Human race, can and should are frequently treated as interchangeable.\n\nBefore you close comm channels on me for being some modern-day Luddite, let me make it clear that I am neither anti-progress nor anti-technology. Innovation is what makes Humanity so great \u2013 and what got us out into this grand universe in the first place. It is a given that progress generally requires risk.\n\nThe problem is that we often approach technology with a set of blinders on as to what has gone before, whether because the bottom line is more important than cautionary tales or because we\u2019re prideful enough to think that we\u2019ll do better this time. With few exceptions, each generation is more advanced than the last, and so we believe that we cannot possibly err in the same fashion as our parents did. So here we are again. ArcCorp\u2019s new AI intiative, which has been roundly debated since their announcement two weeks ago, again seems to be running towards the same pitfalls as our ancestors.\n\nWe can\u2019t possibly make the same mistakes.\n\nSometimes, it isn\u2019t even our fault that we forget. It took nearly ten years of media investigation to wheedle the truth out of the government that maybe, possibly (sarcasm mine) the AI in the terraforming project had been at the heart of the Mars catastrophe of 2125. By then, nobody wanted to hear about it.\n\nOf course, even that wasn\u2019t the first AI disaster. The so called \u201cLemming Car\u201d incident in 2044 Tokyo holds that honor. But less than 100 years later, the government decided that it had worked out the kinks in AI systems and shipped one off to Mars. Of course, they didn\u2019t tell us about it, just in case they were wrong.\n\nThey were.\n\nAnd then just over 100 years after the Mars catastrophe (are we seeing a trend here, people?), came the Artemis. Janus. Even with the vast spectacle of the launch, somebody somewhere had to be nervous that we were still treading the dangerous road of artificial intelligence. But this time, they were sure they had gotten it right.\n\nAdmittedly, we\u2019re not certain that the disappearance of 5000 people was entirely the AI\u2019s fault, but it certainly had to have played a part.\n\nWith a failure that public, the genie went back into the bottle for a while. But we weren\u2019t done. The UEEN merely went back to being covert when they launched their latest failed AI project. Recently declassified documents show just how close we came to war during what became known as the Horus Incident. Working in conjunction with Aegis, the Navy deployed a prototype AI-piloted Overlord bomber wing along the Xi\u2019An front. Their hearts were in the right place: it was an attempt to bring home pilots that had been stationed along the Perry Line for their entire careers. But when Aegis\u2019 billion-credit babies decided that their comms were compromised and shut them off \u2013 just in time to miss their recall order \u2013 we had to chase down and destroy our own mistake, the death knell for Aegis in the shipbuilding industry. Again, we aren\u2019t sure that they would have plunged us into all-out war with the Xi\u2019An by wandering around unsupervised in the neutral zone, but what might they have done?\n\nOf course, the Imperator tried to keep the whole embarrassing sequence out of the feeds. Still, at least it seemed that we had finally learned a healthy enough fear of ever using AI in ships again.\n\nNow it\u2019s the corporate sector\u2019s turn to believe that it won\u2019t repeat the mistakes of prior generations.\n\nArcCorp tells us that its AI will be able to learn, which will enable it to succeed where others have failed. (Where have we heard that one before?) But here\u2019s the thing: Humans do that, too. They have to have years of experience, specific training, and the proper licenses to ever venture out into space. But ArcCorp wants to once again send the artificial equivalent of children out in massive starships to navigate the vastness of our interstellar empire.\n\nHey, it\u2019s progress. It protects Human lives. It must happen.\n\nWhy can\u2019t we learn?\n\nEND FEED"},"links_count":0,"comment_count":142,"created_at":"2013-04-30T00:00:00+00:00","created_at_human":"13 years ago"},"meta":{"processed_at":"2026-05-07 23:59:42","valid_relations":["images","links"],"prev_id":12976,"next_id":12978}}